London 1890 (2)




Results
 
Match scores
Name   Edo    Dev.   Score  /  Games 
Serraillier, Lucien    2204 (103) 1 /
Ballard, William    2246 (76) 0 /
 
Heppell, James    2202 (70) 0.5 /
Jones-Bateman, E.    2331 (61) 0.5 /
 
Vyse, W. Elliot    1971 (87) 0 /
Burroughs, Francis    2059 (70) 1 /
 
Smith, Stephen    2147 (56) 0 /
Chepmell, Claude    2162 (80) 1 /
 
Anger, Frederic    2181 (68) 0.5 /
Gover, F. Field    2144 (68) 0.5 /
 
Jacobs, Herbert    2291 (59) 0 /
Jackson, Edward    2204 (81) 1 /
 
Knight, W.J.J.    2146 (128) 1 /
Jowett, W.W.    0 /
 
Block, Theodore    2254 (66) 1 /
Lambert, Charles    2257 (45) 0 /
 
Howell, Percy    1 /
Macfarlane    0 /
 
Hooke, George    2264 (72) 0 /
Minchin, James    2202 (64) 1 /
 
Sugden, James    1770 (118) 1 /
Minchin, Charles    2065 (58) 0 /
 
Ross, Thomas    2204 (72) 1 /
Nedeyano    0 /
 
Stevens, Samuel    2156 (87) 1 /
Pearse, Arthur    1815 (109) 0 /
 
Moriau, C.    2333 (86) 1 /
Puller, Charles    2045 (104) 0 /
 
Gibbons, T.C.    2134 (40) 0 /
Skipworth, Arthur    2252 (47) 1 /
 
Eckenstein, E.    0 /
Wayte, William    2357 (68) 1 /
 

Event table notes

Event data
Name: City of London - Saint George's Club Match
Place: London
Start date: 30 May 1890
End date: 30 May 1890
 
Notes:
A number of players at this event are only tentatively identified, since the report in the British Chess Magazine gives mostly only surnames, and in some cases where initials are given, there is some doubt about their correctness. For example, I am guessing that 'Bateman' was 'E. Jones-Bateman', a relatively strong London player of the time. 'Jackson', I suppose is 'E.M. Jackson'. 'Knight' I guess is 'W.J. Knight'. 'C.E. Lambert' is almost certainly 'C.J. Lambert'. 'A. Block' I am guessing is actually 'T. Block' without further evidence of another player of the same surname but different initial. 'Howell' could be 'P. Howell', 'A. Howell', or 'J.D. Howell', all City of London Club players of about this time, and I really have little idea which played in this event. I am guessing at 'Percy Howell' on the strength of his more numerous mentions in the chess magazines, and the fact that it was he who played for the City of London Club against the Saint George's in 1891. 'Ross' was probably 'T. Ross', as his name is given in many issues of the British Chess Magazine of the time, and I suspect that this is 'Thomas Richard Edmund Ross', who was still playing for the City of London Club in 1909-1910. 'Stephens' I guess is 'S.J. Stevens'. 'Puller' is very likely 'Charles Giles Puller' (or 'Charles Giles-Puller' as he became known). I am also not sure whether Gibbons' initials were 'T.E.' or 'T.C.'.
 
References
Books
   Sergeant, Century of British Chess, page 214
Periodicals
   [BCM], vol. 10, June 1890, page 219