| Results |
| |
|
Match scores
|
| Name |
Edo |
Dev. |
Score |
/ |
Games |
| Reed, W.F. |
2135 | (87) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Burke, James |
2083 | (144) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Bampton, Samuel |
2320 | (50) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Hymes, Edward |
2319 | (71) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
| McGee (1) |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
| Raubitschek, Robert |
2263 | (56) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
| Mlotkowski, Stasch |
2231 | (49) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Delmar, Eugene |
2260 | (38) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
| Smythe, J. Henry |
1851 | (155) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Schwietzer, George |
2200 | (64) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
| Reichhelm, Gustavus |
2198 | (85) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Siegheim, Bruno |
2275 | (46) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Voigt, Hermann |
2421 | (50) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Hodges, Albert B. |
2368 | (49) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Shipley, Walter |
2359 | (51) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Finn, Julius |
2393 | (43) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Elson, Jacob |
2200 | (87) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Halpern, Jacob |
2260 | (43) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Morgan, Mordecai |
2376 | (59) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Hanham, J. Moore |
2275 | (41) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
| Robinson, Alfred |
2264 | (81) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| de Visser, William |
2312 | (81) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Stadelman, Samuel |
2226 | (58) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Pulvermacher, Albert |
2269 | (75) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Robinson, D. Stuart |
2283 | (60) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Phillips, Harold |
2301 | (47) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
| Martinez, Charles |
2429 | (71) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Baird, David |
2260 | (51) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Young, John |
2208 | (62) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Roething, Otto |
2306 | (40) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
| Roeske, J.F. |
2100 | (60) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Koch, William |
2213 | (61) |
1 | / | 1 |
| |
|
Event table notes
|
| Event data |
| Name: Franklin Chess Club - Manhattan Chess Club Match |
| Place: Philadelphia or New York (?) |
| Start date: 30 May 1903 |
| End date: 30 May 1903 |
| |
| Notes: |
| Urcan cites the New York Times of 31 May 1903, but his list of results differs from the result as given there in several ways. Many of the names of players in the New York Times report are badly garbled, but it is evident that where Urcan has a draw Roething - Voigt (which would be a second game for both of those players) and a win by Delmar over Elson (which would again be a second game for both players), the New York Times has a draw between Pulvermacher and Stadelman, and a win by Raubitschek over McGee. The report in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle of 1 Jun. 1903 does not give complete results, but is mostly consistent with the New York Times, except that it mentions a win by 'Varrath' [sic, Vorrath] of Manhattan, in place of Hanham. I take the New York Times report to be correct, apart from the awful spellings of names. I am guessing that the player named 'Smythe' here was J.H. Smythe, but there was also an F. Smyth in Philadelphia, and it might have been him. |
|
| |
| References |
| Books |
| Hilbert, Writings in Chess History, page 487 |
| Urcan, Julius Finn, page 92 |
| Periodicals |
| [BDE], vol. 63, no. 151, 1 June 1903, page 7 |
| [NYTi], vol. 52, no. 16661, 31 May 1903, page 14 |
| |
